EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Sociology: The Departure of ‘Stray Colleagues in a Vaguely Cognate Discipline’

Ashwani Saith ()
Additional contact information
Ashwani Saith: Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR)

Chapter Chapter 10 in Cambridge Economics in the Post-Keynesian Era, 2022, pp 691-763 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This chapter comes with a health warning: it tells a story of the evolution of sociology in Cambridge, as pieced together by an economist, the act of presumption partially justified by the fact that Cambridge sociology was fostered since its birth, well or poorly, in the twin Faculty and DAE homes of Cambridge economics where it resided till well into adulthood, when the hostility of the orthodox economists’ campaign against the heterodox groups intensified the attraction, and opened up a realistic prospect, for ‘leaving home’ and seeking an independent existence in the institutional melee of the social sciences in Cambridge, hoping at the end to establish a department of its own. The turning point was the university review of the DAE of 1984–1987 in which the Hahn-Matthews camp lobbied vehemently for sociology and sociologists to be shown the door, and so it transpired, despite the almost universal and strongly expressed support for sociology and sociologists by their economist colleagues of various heterodox persuasions, both from within the DAE and the Faculty. This departure further strengthened the numerical hold of the orthodox Hahn-Matthews group over decision making in the Faculty of Economics, the prime, if covert motivation for its ostensibly academic ‘purification’ campaign. This episode is explored, using archival materials, within a wider discussion of the evolution to maturity of sociology as a taught discipline in the face of hostile academic and institutional environments in the UK, dominated by vocal economists and scientists. The heterodox economists of Cambridge, in the DAE and in the Faculty, with their realization of the worth of multidisciplinary research, stand out as exceptions in this regard. The narrative here offers some novel insights into the period of the life of Cambridge sociology spent in the home of Cambridge economics.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-030-93019-6_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783030930196

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93019-6_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-030-93019-6_10