Conclusion

Daniel Cash ()
Additional contact information
Daniel Cash: Aston University

Chapter Chapter 7 in Sustainability Rating Agencies vs Credit Rating Agencies, 2021, pp 143-145 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The conclusion brings together the dominant strands within the book and demonstrates the interconnectedness between them. The trajectories of two of the leading political components within the Western development of the concept of sustainable finance are pursuing particular and different objectives, but neither have a strong chance of success. The American trajectory has dismissed the usage of ESG within the financial services (although that may change under the Biden Administration, whilst this also highlights the fragmented development of the American experience), and Europe has pursued a progressive agenda that is more ideologically sound than it is practical, with obvious consequences regarding a lack of authority to truly impose the model of sustainable financial practice now coming to bear. The two developments are actively impacting the battle to serve the mainstream investor. Yet, some private developments are reviewed and concluded here and adjoined to the chances of success for the two industries the book focuses on.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:psifcp:978-3-030-71693-6_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783030716936

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-71693-6_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().