Tax and Spend: Towards a Smaller State?
Adrian Williamson
Additional contact information
Adrian Williamson: Trinity Hall
Chapter 3 in Conservative Economic Policymaking and the Birth of Thatcherism, 1964–1979, 2015, pp 58-88 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract In November 1978, Arthur Cockfield addressed the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).1 As will appear, Cockfield and the IFS had played, and would continue to play, important parts in debates over taxation and spending. Cockfield claimed to detect a turning point on spending and associated revenue policies, in Britain and elsewhere: ‘public resentment will ultimately compel a reduction in the role of the state … it may well be that the collectivist tide has already reached its high water mark’.2 Much of the literature reflects this apparent Conservative intellectual and rhetorical self-confidence. Some writers have discerned Conservative enthusiasm for radical Republican policies.3 Thus, Gamble suggests that, after 1974, the Conservatives embraced ‘the revival of a liberal economy’.4 In his view, they sought large reductions in welfare spending to secure substantial cuts in taxation.5
Keywords: Public Spending; Capital Spending; Indirect Taxis; Direct Taxation; Council House (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-1-137-46026-4_3
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137460264
DOI: 10.1057/9781137460264_3
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().