Seduced by Symmetry, Smarter by Half
James Ming Chen
Additional contact information
James Ming Chen: Michigan State University
Chapter Chapter 4 in Postmodern Portfolio Theory, 2016, pp 41-58 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) remains the dominant paradigm in financial risk management—at least among practitioners, if not among scholars.1 Courts and regulators likewise depend on the CAPM, and in so doing confer legal significance on this model.2 Once upon a time, long long ago, “the hegemony of the CAPM” could be attributed “mostly to its apparent ease of applicability and, to a lesser extent, its empirical justifications.”3 The latter excuse, at least, has withered away. Despite evidence that beta is not positively related to returns on stock,4 to say nothing of beta’s failure to account for macroeconomic5 and idiosyncratic6 factors affecting security prices and returns, much of contemporary mathematical finance still hinges on the CAPM. Even Eugene Fama, beta’s leading nemesis, has conceded that “market professionals (and academics) still think about risk in terms of market β.”7
Keywords: Stock Return; Asset Price; Supra Note; Systematic Risk; Prospect Theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:qpochp:978-1-137-54464-3_4
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137544643
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-54464-3_4
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Quantitative Perspectives on Behavioral Economics and Finance from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().