On the Political Economy of Privatization in Eastern Germany

Uwe Siegmund
Additional contact information
Uwe Siegmund: Institute of World Economics, Kiel

Chapter 3 in Privatization, Corporate Governance and the Emergence of Markets, 2000, pp 33-49 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Privatization in Eastern Germany has largely been deemed very special, efficient and unpolitical in the sense that the government and its privatization agent, the Treuhand, behaved in a welfare-maximizing manner (Brüicker. 1997; Dyck, 1997; Fischer et a!., 1996; Freest. 1995). The government and/or Treuhand were right to choose privatization as the major aim to promote efficiency and to pursue other aims as well, to choose negoliiitioiis as the major privatization method and to choose a state organization somewhere between a bureau and a public firm (Anslull) as the organizational form for the privatization agent. There were no other real and better alternatives available, given the conditions for the privatization in Eastern Germany. Efficiency aims dominated equity aims, il political conditions were taken into account in this economics of privatization approach they were explained ad hoc and exogenously given to the government and/or Treuhand, This seems to be an incomplete picture of eastern German privatization, because the Jasinski-Yarrow privatization paradox applied in Eastern Germany as It applied in other countries: Like public ownership itself, privatization is a policy of the state and is determined by political decision makers. The motives that drive privatization will be those of politicians and bureaucrats, which, as a consequence of the political agency problem, can not in general be identified with the public interest, social welfare or economic efficiency. This leads to the paradox (or dilemma) of privatization: the process of privatization is liable to be subject to the same kinds of inefficiencies — deriving from the political and enterprise agency problems — as the SOEs that it seeks to eliminate. Put another way, government failure is both a motive for privatization and an obstacle to its efficient implementation. (Jasinski and Yarrow, 1996, p. 18)

Keywords: Corporate Governance; Assignment Problem; Transition Country; Privatization Agent; Soft Budget Constraint (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:stuchp:978-0-230-28607-8_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230286078

DOI: 10.1057/9780230286078_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Studies in Economic Transition from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().