Exploring Social Media’s Fascination with Scholarly Research on Fake News: Insights from 500 Viral Studies

Bwsrang Basumatary () and Manoj Kumar Verma ()
Additional contact information
Bwsrang Basumatary: B.B. Kishan College, Central Library
Manoj Kumar Verma: Mizoram University, Dept. of Library and Information Science

A chapter in Proceedings of the International Conference on Marching Beyond the Libraries: Talent, Technology, and Transformation (ICMBL 2025), 2026, pp 3-15 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the dissemination patterns and societal impact of the 500 most-discussed research articles on “fake news”. By examining Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) data, year-wise distribution, and citation metrics, we document a profound shift in scholarly communication from traditional, reader-based metrics to a dynamic, social media-dominated landscape. The findings reveal the meteoric rise of X (formerly Twitter) as the central hub for public discussion, alongside the emergence of new platforms like Bluesky, while traditional academic readers (e.g., Mendeley) remain significant for literature. Analysis of influential fields shows that while Psychology, Biomedical, and Health Sciences are the most productive, research from Information and Computing Sciences garners the highest median public attention per article, highlighting a societal demand for technological solutions. A small group of authors from elite Anglo-American institutions leads the field in both output and impact, and their work is predominantly published in high-prestige journals such as Nature and Science. Crucially, a correlation analysis reveals a statistically insignificant, near-zero relationship between an article’s citation count and its AAS (r = 0.066, p = 0.141). This decoupling indicates that scholarly impact and public engagement are distinct, non-overlapping spheres. The study concludes that the fight against misinformation is being waged on two separate fronts: one within the academic community, measured by citations, and another in the public sphere, driven by social media. This necessitates a strategic approach from researchers seeking societal impact, who must actively engage with public dissemination channels beyond traditional academic publishing.

Keywords: Fake News; Scholarly Communication; Altmetrics; Social Media; Research Dissemination; Misinformation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-614-2_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789462396142

DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-614-2_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().