The Debate About Political Risk: How Corruption, Favoritism and Institutional Ambiguity Shape Business Strategies in Ukraine

Johannes Leitner (), Hannes Meissner and Ewa Martyna-David
Additional contact information
Johannes Leitner: University of Applied Sciences bfi Vienna
Hannes Meissner: University of Applied Sciences bfi Vienna
Ewa Martyna-David: University of Applied Sciences bfi Vienna

A chapter in EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery, 2015, pp 3-19 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Drawing both on the literature on political risks in international business studies and on further reaching theoretical approaches of political science, this paper provides an innovative model on corruption, favoritism and institutional ambiguity to better understand political risks in Ukraine. This model is then used to analyze the difficult business environment of Ukraine. Referring to this, the paper finally reveals coping strategies of international enterprises.

Keywords: Political risk; Business strategies; D73; M20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-319-10133-0_1

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319101330

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_1

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Contributions to Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().