Mergers and Acquisitions: The Impact of Hiring Financial Advisors on Acquirer Shareholder Wealth in the US and UK Financial Services Sector

Bachir Sahyoun, George Giannopoulos, Yannis Anagnostopoulos and Nicos Sykianakis
Additional contact information
Bachir Sahyoun: Kingston University
George Giannopoulos: Kingston University
Yannis Anagnostopoulos: Kingston University
Nicos Sykianakis: Piraeus University of Applied Sciences

A chapter in The Political Economy of Development in Southeastern Europe, 2018, pp 161-197 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract We document the impact of financial advisors in the announcement returns of M&A deals for the UK and the US financial services sectors. Our sample includes 1438 M&A deals announced during the period January 1999 to January 2010. The acquirer in these deals is a UK or US public listed firm in the financial sector, but there are no restrictions for the country of origin, the sector, or the listing status for the target firms. We provide some contrary evidence to prior studies that documented a positive relationship between various measures of financial advisor quality and M&A returns. Our results show that acquiring firms performing in-house M&As, rather than hiring financial advisors, have consistently achieved higher abnormal returns. Furthermore, acquiring firms hiring top-tier advisors within our sample achieve lower abnormal returns than the acquirers hiring lower-tier advisors. In addition, acquiring firms hiring top-tier advisors achieve low (negative) returns in M&As where targets are publicly listed. However, consistent with prior research, our findings suggest that top-tier advisors are able to achieve the highest deal completion rates amongst any other tier of advisors and commanded the highest fees. The question thus also revolves around not only whether financial advisors add value but rather whether their added value and knowledge also seem to be compensated by the huge sums of money they get paid. Achieving higher returns will be a justification of financial advisory excellence and higher premium fees. Overall, returns around the M&A announcement in this sector are perceived pessimistically. Our results also imply that financial advisors are not equally important across all deal types. Top-tier advisors perform much more complex deals which are on average at least ten times larger in size than any other M&A deal.

Keywords: Mergers and acquisitions; Financial advisors; Return; Financial sector (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G10 G20 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-319-93452-5_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319934525

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93452-5_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Contributions to Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().