EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Time Dependent Relative Risk Aversion

Enzo Giacomini (), Michael Handel () and Wolfgang Härdle
Additional contact information
Enzo Giacomini: Humboldt-University of Berlin
Michael Handel: Dr. Nagler & Company GmbH

A chapter in Risk Assessment, 2009, pp 15-46 from Springer

Abstract: Risk management has developed in the recent decades to be one of the most fundamental issues in quantitative finance. Various models are being developed and applied by researchers as well as financial institutions. By modeling price fluctuations of assets in a portfolio, the loss can be estimated using statistical methods. Different measures of risk, such as standard deviation of returns or confidence interval Value at Risk, have been suggested. These measures are based on the probability distributions of assets' returns extracted from the data-generating process of the asset. However, an actual one dollar loss is not always valued in practice as a one dollar loss. Purely statistical estimation of loss has the disadvantage of ignoring the circumstances of the loss. Hence the notion of an investor's utility has been introduced. Arrow [2] and [10] were the first to introduce elementary securities to formalize economics of uncertainty. The so-called Arrow-Debreu securities are the starting point of all modern financial asset pricing theories. Arrow—Debreu securities entitle their holder to a payoff of 1$ in one specific state of the world, and 0 in all other states of the world. The price of such a security is determined by the market, on which it is tradable, and is subsequent to a supply and demand equilibrium. Moreover, these prices contain information about investors' preferences due to their dependence on the conditional probabilities of the state of the world at maturity and due to the imposition of market-clearing and general equilibrium conditions. The prices reflect investors' beliefs about the future, and the fact that they are priced differently in different states of the world implies, that a one-dollar gain is not always worth the same, in fact its value is exactly the price of the security.

Keywords: Utility Function; Risk Aversion; Asset Price; Option Price; Implied Volatility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Time dependent relative risk aversion (2006) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-2050-8_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783790820508

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2050-8_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Contributions to Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-2050-8_3