Globalization-Driven Structural Transformation in BRICS Economies: Trade Competitiveness, Technological Innovation, and Intra-Bloc Dependency Dynamics

Poshan Yu (), Xinyuan Jiang and Lanbei Yin
Additional contact information
Poshan Yu: Soochow University
Xinyuan Jiang: Soochow University
Lanbei Yin: Soochow University

Chapter Chapter 3 in International Trade and Economic Development in BRICS, 2026, pp 51-78 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This study investigates the interplay between globalization-driven structural transformations, technological innovation, and intra-bloc trade dependencies within BRICS economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) from 2008 to 2023, a critical nexus in an era of de-globalization and techno-nationalism. BRICS, collectively accounting for 31.5% of global GDP, faces paradoxes: while leveraging global value chains, it grapples with asymmetric technological dependencies and commodity export vulnerabilities. Existing literature lacks an integrated framework to analyze these dynamics, particularly the role of institutional variations and Sino-centric trade networks. Using CiteSpace bibliometric analysis of WoS and CNKI publications, the study maps thematic clusters and temporal trends, contrasting global systemic perspectives (WoS) with China-centric policy narratives (CNKI). Empirical analysis employs Pearson correlation to quantify relationships between R&D intensity, patent applications, and trade volume, alongside intra-BRICS trade dependency metrics. Key findings reveal stark asymmetries: China’s state-led innovation ecosystem demonstrates a strong positive correlation between R&D intensity (r = 0.935) and high-tech exports, while India’s “innovation paradox” (r = 0.768 for patents, r = -0.372 for R&D intensity) reflects fragmented commercialization. Russia’s defense-centric R&D shows weak patent-trade linkages (r = 0.109), tied to resource-dependent exports. Intra-bloc trade dependencies are asymmetric, with Brazil (31.51%), Russia (27.77%), and South Africa (25.65%) highly reliant on China, compared to India’s low dependency (2.38%). The study underscores the need for context-specific policies to address structural inequalities, emphasizing institutional coordination for technology transfer and inclusive growth. By bridging global and local perspectives, this research advances understanding of BRICS’ dual identity as both beneficiaries and challengers of globalization, offering insights for policymakers to optimize innovation ecosystems and mitigate asymmetric interdependencies.

Keywords: BRICS economies; Digital infrastructure; Globalization; Intra-bloc dependencies; Patent applications; R&D intensity; Technological innovation; Trade competitiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:conchp:978-981-95-8801-5_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789819588015

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-8801-5_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Contributions to Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().