EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Managing Tensions in Sustainability in Chinese and New Zealand Business Partnerships: A Conceptual Perspective

Michelle Sitong Chen (), Gabriel Eweje () and Jeffrey C. Kennedy ()
Additional contact information
Michelle Sitong Chen: Massey University
Gabriel Eweje: Massey University
Jeffrey C. Kennedy: Massey University

A chapter in Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future, 2019, pp 145-168 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Sustainable developmentSustainable development presents many challenges and tensions, which requires acceptance and continuous efforts to manage by organisations in a wider sustainability journey. The problem is, most global firms find it difficult to rationalise the nature of these tensions, their dynamic relationships in sustainability, and how to systematically address their complex relationships simultaneously. In this regard, these firms are faced with a great deal of ambiguity and difficulties in understanding these tensions, their implications, and the managerial strategiesStrategies in responding to them. This begs the questions of the nature of tensionsTensions in sustainability and management strategiesStrategies in holding these tensions into a dynamic equilibriumDynamic equilibrium. To explore these questions, this chapter examines potential tensions which may exist in addressing divergent sustainability aspects in the context of Chinese and New Zealand business partnerships. In order to address these tensions dynamically, this chapter has established a conceptual theoretical model through an interplay among Smith and Lewis, Hahn, Pinkse and Preuss as well as Li Peter Ping’s models. This will enrich the existing literature of tensions inherent in sustainability. In addition, this conceptual model will not only contribute to Chinese and New Zealand firms in business partnerships to better manage tensionsTensions, but also for global firms who are dedicated to achieving holistic sustainabilityHolistic sustainability. We also consider the conceptual integrityIntegrity and practical prospects for tensions in future sustainability research to be explored in more specific contexts.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-11217-2_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030112172

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11217-2_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-11217-2_7