Implications of Fluidity in Compliance Regime for India’s Compulsory CSR Law

Debanjali Saha (), Rinkesh Dharod () and Raj Janagam ()
Additional contact information
Debanjali Saha: Surge Impact Foundation
Rinkesh Dharod: AIC-IIITH Foundation
Raj Janagam: Surge Impact Foundation

A chapter in Corporate Social Responsibility in a Dynamic Global Environment, 2023, pp 133-153 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In 2013, India introduced compulsory CSR spending by corporates over a certain size which created a pool of resources for innovative social impact activities. However, in reality, this law is yet to achieve its full potential. Direct work of T-Social Impact Group (official CSR cell of Telangana) and evidence-based research account multiple factors for this phenomenon. However, one of the primary factors is the ever-changing and heavy regulatory framework which shifted away from the original principles and acts as structural impediments to innovation and effectiveness. CSR rules are in constant flux with arbitrary (and at times) contradictory amendments and clarifications. These changes lack guiding philosophy and long-term objectives, reflecting only short-term political or policy imperatives. On cue, the entire framework of CSR laws was again changed on January 22, 2021, with significant changes in CSR definitions, implementation, reporting, and monitoring of projects. This paper argues that constant changes have stifled innovation and shifted the focus on compliance. This paper provides an in-depth review of the legal changes and analyzes their impact in Indian CSR space. Emphasis is on shifting compliance regimes instead of efficacious, creative approaches. These changes, arising out of contradiction in CSR model and political and policy choices of the government, have significantly changed the nature of CSR. Focus is not on beneficiary but on compliance to meet short-term aims of government or as revenue source for the government. In tandem, corporations have adopted a risk adverse bureaucratic approach to CSR which has decelerated decision-making and impact. Overregulation increases costs for companies, pushing them toward traditional, risk-averse programs. Overall, it creates a cautious environment where choices are made with the aim to avoid bureaucratic complications than use CSR as a tool for sustainable impact.

Keywords: India; Compliance; Corporate governance; Role of government; Regulation; Bureaucracy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-24647-0_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031246470

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24647-0_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().