Entrepreneurial Catch Up and New Industrial Competence Bloc Formation in the Baltic Sea Region

Gunnar Eliasson () and Pontus Braunerhjelm
Additional contact information
Gunnar Eliasson: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)

A chapter in The Evolution of Economic and Innovation Systems, 2015, pp 341-372 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract 1990 saw the break up of the Soviet political system. The liberated, but poor formerly planned economies were left on their own to restore their institutions to that of an open market organization. Even though roughly on par with the Nordic countries before being annexed, 50 years of Soviet isolation had left the formerly planned Baltic Sea Region (BSR) economies in an industrially backward state. Critical market institutions did not exist, and corruption made normal business life impossible. Catch up with Western industrial economies therefore became a policy priority. During the 1970s also the industrialized BSR economies had introduced elements of centralized planning that restricted free entrepreneurial activities. By the Soviet collapse stagnation had therefore also brought the need for entrepreneurship onto the policy agenda of Western BSR nations. Institutional obstacles to economic progress were gradually being dismantled. Historic developments in the BSR have therefore accidentally staged a unique economic policy experiment. Using a competence bloc based method of identifying the role of the entrepreneur in observed macroeconomic catch-up, we can distinguish between the relative roles in economic progress among the BSR economies of improvements in local entrepreneurial environments, and of individual entrepreneurial action. We found that successful catch-up among the formerly planned BSR economies still has a long way to go, and that policy focus should be set on improving the local entrepreneurial environments to support both new firm formation for long run development, and to encourage immediate FDI for short term effects. Significant obstacles to trade and ownership transactions, however, remain across the BSR. Hence, success in catch-up should be expected to differ significantly among the BSR countries. We propose a policy competition among the transition countries in improving their entrepreneurial environments to beat each other in long run catch-up performance, that will benefit both catch-up of individual economies, and growth of the entire BSR economy.

Keywords: Private Equity; Policy Competition; Firm Formation; Entrepreneurial Environment; Technology Asset (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: ENTRERPRENEURIAL CATCH UP AND NEW INDUSTRIAL COMPETENCE BLOC FORMATION IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eccchp:978-3-319-13299-0_15

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319132990

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13299-0_15

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Economic Complexity and Evolution from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().