Does History Matter? Empirical Analysis of Evolutionary Versus Stationary Equilibrium Views of the Economy

Kenneth I. Carlaw () and Richard Lipsey ()
Additional contact information
Kenneth I. Carlaw: University of British Columbia

A chapter in Long Term Economic Development, 2013, pp 137-174 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The evolutionary vision in which history matters is of an evolving economy driven by bursts of technological change initiated by agents facing uncertainty and producing long term, path-dependent growth and shorter-term, non-random investment cycles. The alternative vision in which history does not matter is of a stationary, ergodic process driven by rational agents facing risk and producing stable trend growth and shorter term cycles caused by random disturbances. We use Carlaw and Lipsey’s simulation model of non-stationary, sustained growth driven by endogenous, path-dependent technological change under uncertainty to generate artificial macro data. We match these data to the New Classical stylized growth facts. The raw simulation data pass standard tests for trend and difference stationarity, exhibiting unit roots and cointegrating processes of order one. Thus, contrary to current belief, these tests do not establish that the real data are generated by a stationary process. Real data are then used to estimate time-varying NAIRU’s for six OECD countries. The estimates are shown to be highly sensitive to the time period over which they are made. They also fail to show any relation between the unemployment gap, actual unemployment minus estimated NAIRU and the acceleration of inflation. Thus there is no tendency for inflation to behave as required by the New Keynesian and earlier New Classical theory. We conclude by rejecting the existence of a well-defined a short-run, negatively sloped Philips curve, a NAIRU, a unique general equilibrium with its implication, a vertical long-run Phillips curve, and the long-run neutrality of money.

Keywords: Kalman Filter; Unit Root; Cointegration Test; Phillips Curve; History Matter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Does history matter?: Empirical analysis of evolutionary versus stationary equilibrium views of the economy (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eccchp:978-3-642-35125-9_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783642351259

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35125-9_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Economic Complexity and Evolution from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().