Assessment of the Forest Carbon Balance Due to Deforestation and Plantation Forestry in Southeast Asia

Nophea Sasaki (), Yadanar Yè Myint () and Manjunatha Venkatappa ()
Additional contact information
Nophea Sasaki: Asian Institute of Technology
Yadanar Yè Myint: Asian Institute of Technology
Manjunatha Venkatappa: Asian Institute of Technology

Chapter Chapter 4 in Energy Sustainability and Climate Change in ASEAN, 2021, pp 89-110 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Assessment of the carbon balance due to changes in forest land uses could serve as an important benchmark for the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) scheme of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Here, we assessed the carbon gains and loss due to deforestation and plantation forestry in Southeast Asia during the implementation period of the Paris Climate Agreement between 2020 and 2030. Data on forest cover and carbon stocks were obtained from the most recent forest resources assessment report by the Food and Agriculture Organization. We performed a regression analysis to obtain parameters and initial values for predicting the forest cover change, where logging was assumed to take place in both natural and plantation forests. Between 2000 and 2020, Southeast Asia lost about 0.5%, or 1.1 million hectares, every year, whilst plantation forests gained 1.8%. Carbon stocks in natural forests declined to 15.7 petagrams of carbon (PgC) in 2030 from 19.7 PgC in 2000. On average, Southeast Asia emits about 468.6 teragrams of carbon dioxide per year (TgCO2 year−1) due to the loss of natural forests and logging, or about 23% of emissions, from tropical forests. Plantation forests gain about 25.9 TgCO2 year−1 between 2000 and 2030. Between 2020 and 2030, Southeast Asia is likely to emit about 442.7 TgCO2 year−1. If a retrospective approach is used, the forest reference emission level for this region is 424.2 TgCO2 year−1 during the implementation period of the Paris Agreement. Carbon revenues under the REDD+ scheme were estimated at US$2.4 billion annually under the Paris Agreement. Our study suggests that plantation forests could play a role in increasing role wood supply to the region, but caution is needed because large-scale plantations can cause environmental destruction.

Keywords: REDD+ scheme; Fast-growing plantation; Slow-growing plantation; Carbon removals; FREL (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-16-2000-3_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789811620003

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2000-3_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().