Tolerable Inequality According to Utilitarians

Maurizio Bovi

Chapter Chapter 5 in The Dual Challenge of Tolerable Economic Inequality, 2025, pp 45-58 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Though utilitarians, like proponents of desert-based and meritocratic approaches, tolerate some degree of inequality, the justification for this tolerance differs significantly. For utilitarians, the moral fairness of a distributive system lies in its capacity to maximize overall utility—whether defined as happiness, well-being, or preference satisfaction. The social product, therefore, should be allocated in ways that generate “the greatest happiness for the greatest number,” to use Jeremy Bentham’s words. An ethically appealing aspect of this view is that resources are distributed according to individual preferences; for example, utilitarians might argue that avid readers should receive more books than those uninterested in reading. However, critics contend that this principle assumes all preferences are equally deserving of fulfillment. In reality, some desires—such as those related to smoking, excessive drinking, or gambling—can impose significant social costs. Allocating resources purely to satisfy preferences thus risks promoting harmful or socially detrimental behaviors. Moreover, utilitarianism’s focus on maximizing aggregate well-being often sidelines other moral concerns, such as merit, equal opportunity, and individual liberties. Consequently, this view has faced substantial criticism from philosophers across a range of ethical traditions.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:esichp:978-3-031-97066-5_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031970665

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-97066-5_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().