Two Treatments of Pluralism: Canada and the United States

Margaret F. Brinig ()
Additional contact information
Margaret F. Brinig: University of Notre Dame

A chapter in Law and Economics in Europe and the U.S, 2016, pp 135-154 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Canada and the United States, while similar in many ways, diverge substantially when it comes to family law. Canada’s marriage and divorce law is national, while the U.S. family law is largely governed by state law. This makes rules in the United States heterogeneous compared to those in Canada, and thus easier to tailor to the preferences of people living in the various states. A more important difference between the two treatments is that Canada supports a diversity of relationships positively (through providing for financial assistance and legal recognition) and through its public policy. The United States, while tolerating most family forms, formally recognizes only marriage and adoption, leaving adults in heterodox relationships to private support or contract. In both these North American jurisdictions, people live in a variety of family forms. While most heterosexual couples marry, some do not. This paper considers the effects of the differing policies on young people in two minority groups, the Québécois in Canada and African Americans in the United States, both of which groups de facto eschew formal marriage. Both are relatively impoverished groups, and both historically have suffered discrimination and been underrepresented among the national power elites. Yet despite these surface differences, the two groups diverge in terms of the mental health of their youth, and quite notably in terms of the rate at which they commit suicide. This chapter will attempt to portray these similarities and differences as well as propose several reasons for the differing results. Most of my interactions with Jüergen Backhaus over the past 20 years stemmed from his editorship of the European Journal of Law and Economics. Some of these involved articles that were for some reason too controversial to find ready acceptance elsewhere.

Keywords: Supra Note; National Longitudinal Survey; Catholic School; Fragile Family; Unmarried Couple (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:euhchp:978-3-319-47471-7_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319474717

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47471-7_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().