Impacts of AI on US Copyright Law

Steve Collins () and Sarah Keith ()
Additional contact information
Steve Collins: Macquarie University
Sarah Keith: Macquarie University

Chapter 11 in Handbook of AI-based Media Disruption, 2026, pp 219-238 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter provides an overview of the clash between copyright and generative AI, exploring the tensions and possible solutions. Although this is a global issue and implicates multiple legal jurisdictions and traditions, this chapter will primarily focus on US copyright law. We begin with an overview of copyright itself and, importantly, illustrate that copyright has not remained static since its inception. We move on to introduce fair use, which ostensibly exists to act as a safety valve that prevents copyright monopolies from stifling future creativity, and is the main provision that supports training AI models on copyrighted material. The discussion section follows to interrogate the two key copyright issues raised by generative AI. First, we look at the authorship requirement of copyright: whether generative AI outputs are themselves copyrightable, and how the current stance affects the market value of these works. Second, we discuss the tensions in training generative AI models on copyrighted works. In assessing the claims for training as infringement and training as fair use, we will illustrate the culturally deterministic role played by copyright. As Goldstein (Copyright’s highway: The law and Lore of copyright from Gutenberg to the celestial jukebox. Hill and Wang, 1994, p. 35) reminds us, “Other more familiar bodies of law—contracts, torts, and crimes—have an even longer history, but none occupies this special place in ordering a nation’s culture, high and low.” We finish this section with a discussion of possible solutions, some of which are beginning to emerge at the time of writing. The chapter concludes by affirming the crucial questions before judges and legislators as they decide whether copyright is a facilitator of or hurdle for generative AI. These are decisions that will carry significant ramifications for concepts of authorship and ownership, as well as creativity and culture more broadly.

Keywords: Copyright and generative AI; Fair use; US Copyright Law; Authorship requirements; Training AI models; Cultural determinism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:fuobcp:978-3-032-07605-2_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032076052

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-07605-2_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Future of Business and Finance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().