Integrating the Social Impacts into Risk Governance of Nanotechnology

Vrishali Subramanian, Elena Semenzin, Alex Zabeo, Danail Hristozov, Ineke Malsch, Peter Saling, Toon Harmelen, Tom Ligthart and Antonio Marcomini ()
Additional contact information
Vrishali Subramanian: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Elena Semenzin: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Alex Zabeo: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Danail Hristozov: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Ineke Malsch: Malsch TechnoValuation
Peter Saling: BASF SE
Toon Harmelen: TNO
Tom Ligthart: TNO
Antonio Marcomini: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice

Chapter Chapter 4 in Managing Risk in Nanotechnology, 2016, pp 51-70 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Literature on the risk governance of nanotechnology places significant emphasis on the potential social impacts of nano-enabled products. However, there is limited information on which social impacts are relevant for nano-enabled products, and a methodology to monitor them to support risk governance is lacking. This chapter proposes a quantitative methodology based on Social Life Cycle Assessment (s-LCA) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to assess the social impacts of nano-enabled products through their life cycle. The s-LCA conceptual scheme (i.e. impacts and indicators for different stakeholders) is developed through an appraisal of literature on social impacts of products and Ethical, Legal and Social Impacts (ELSI) of nanotechnology, which is used to select suitable indicators in statistical databases. Five indicators associated with impacts of nano-enabled products, with two impacts in Worker category (professional training and non-fatal accidents) and three impacts in Community category (education, employment, research and development expenditure), were identified as relevant to compare nano-enabled products with similar functionality or nano-enabled product with their conventional counterpart. The indicators are organized within a conceptual scheme comprising benefits (education, employment and professional training) and costs (research and development expenditure and non-fatal accidents). A quantitative MCDA methodology is proposed and applied to a case study according to benefit-cost conceptual scheme. The gaps to be addressed to expand the future development of methodologies to assess social impacts of nano-enabled products are discussed.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Social Impact; Unite Nations Environmental Programme; Global Reporting Initiative; Social Life Cycle Assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-32392-3_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319323923

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32392-3_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().