In Support of the Inclusion of Data on Nanomaterials Transformations and Environmental Interactions into Existing Regulatory Frameworks

Iseult Lynch () and Robert Gregory Lee
Additional contact information
Iseult Lynch: School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham
Robert Gregory Lee: Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham

Chapter Chapter 9 in Managing Risk in Nanotechnology, 2016, pp 145-169 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Research traditionally outstrips regulation leading to a lag between scientific advances and regulatory frameworks. This is nowhere more apparent than in the arena of nanomaterials (NMs) safety testing. Here, regulatory focus has been on assessing the suitability of existing regulatory regimes and standardised assays for use with NMs. Meanwhile scientific focus has moved towards an acceptance of the fact that as-made or so-called pristine NMs do not exist in real products or the environments as a result of physical, chemical, biological and binding-related transformations which drive the NMs towards lower surface energy states. Thus, in parallel with the move towards alternative test methods, there is a need to support regulatory authorities in understanding the relevant species to test in the case of NMs risk assessment and how to best incorporate such new knowledge into regulation. This chapter appraises some of the steps that could support such a transition, including looking for precedent in contiguous regulatory models for assessing transformed variants (e.g. pesticide metabolites), considering grouping and read-across strategies for likely NMs transformations, and validating standard tests for NMs ageing. Finally, it will consider the legal issues surrounding manufacturer’s responsibility for providing safety data for materials that are no longer the as-produced materials. As there is an essentially infinite array of uses/formulations for NMs, all of which can transform the NM from its original form and composition; where does and should a manufacturer’s responsibilities end?

Keywords: Sewage Sludge; Natural Organic Matter; Plant Protection Product; Sewage Sludge Amendment; OECD Test Guideline (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-32392-3_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319323923

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32392-3_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().