Towards Foresight 3.0: The HCSS Metafore Approach—A Multilingual Approach for Exploring Global Foresights

Stephan Spiegeleire (), Freija Duijne () and Eline Chivot ()
Additional contact information
Stephan Spiegeleire: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS)
Freija Duijne: Ministry of Economic Affairs
Eline Chivot: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS)

Chapter Chapter 6 in Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis, 2016, pp 99-117 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The policymaking community puts ever more emphasis on basing policy on rigorously collected and curated objective evidence (‘evidence-based policy’). But what is the equivalent for the future of what ‘evidence’ is for the past and present? This paper presents some examples of what we call ‘Foresight 3.0’: an attempt to distil more insights about the entire futurespace by systematically collecting, parsing, visualizing and analysing a large database with elements of the future (futuribles) as they are perceived across the globe. This global ‘futurebase’ allows policy analysts and policymakers to gauge the bandwidth of views on these futuribles across different constituencies (and different languages and cultures). The hope is that such an approach will allow us to transcend some of the widely acknowledged bias problems with many current approaches to foresight. This paper introduces one of the approaches The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies pursuing to move the current debate about foresight for strategic planning in more of a 3.0 direction: the HCSS Metafore approach. The paper briefly presents the main steps in the Metafore research protocol that was used in some recent HCSS work for the Dutch government’s ‘Strategic Monitor’, which tries to anticipate the future in the area of foreign, security and defence policy. The essence of the protocol is that we try to collect a much larger corpus of foresight studies in a particular field than has hitherto been possible and then code these with both manual (for the smaller sets) and semi-automated (for the larger sets) coding tools. The results are then visualized in different ways and analysed. We describe the protocol and provide some illustrative examples. The paper concludes by discussing some of the strengths and weaknesses of such a ‘Metafore’ approach for strategic policymaking.

Keywords: Foresight; Text mining; Metafore protocol (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-39056-7_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319390567

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39056-7_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().