Poor Versus Prosperous India

Madhusudan Ghosh ()
Additional contact information
Madhusudan Ghosh: Visva Bharati

Chapter 3 in Regional Development and Public Policy Challenges in India, 2015, pp 73-103 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Third chapter has conventionally taken state as a unit, and has evaluated the relative performance of five poor states (Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh) and five prosperous states (Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Maharashtra and Punjab) on the basis of some income and non-income dimensions of development from 1970-71 to 2008-09. Such an attempt is to prioritize the policy recommendations for the poor states for both immediate intervention and long-term convergence. The performance of the prosperous states in terms of per capita income has been far better than that of the poor states, and the gap in the average per capita income between the two groups of states has widened over time, particularly after the large-scale economic reforms. With better economic performance, these prosperous states have also done better than the poor states on education, health and human development. Though in case of Gujarat, such relationship between economic performance and human development is not strongly established. The author has observed that the states, which are economically more independent, more reform-oriented and have better physical, social and financial infrastructures, have performed better in terms of per capita income. This suggests that the slower-reforming and poorly performing states could improve their relative economic position and catch up with the better-performing states by speeding up the reform process, in particular by liberalizing their investment, industrial and infrastructure policies. The author has also found that the states, which have higher per capita incomes and which were able to spend a higher per capita amount on social services, have performed better in terms of human development, implying that spending higher per capita amounts in the social sector could be an effective way of achieving improvements in human development, and such causal relationship must be explicitly brought out in the policy process on regional development.

Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment; Infant Mortality Rate; Poor State; Human Development Index; Human Development Indicator (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isbchp:978-81-322-2346-7_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9788132223467

DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2346-7_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in India Studies in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().