Improving Antiterrorism Risk Analysis
Louis Anthony Cox ()
Additional contact information
Louis Anthony Cox: Cox Associates
Chapter Chapter 15 in Risk Analysis of Complex and Uncertain Systems, 2009, pp 351-369 from Springer
Abstract:
Several important risk analysis methods now used in setting priorities for protecting U.S. infrastructures against terrorist attacks are based on the formula risk = threat × vulnerability × consequence. This chapter identifies potential limitations in such methods that limit their ability to guide resource allocations to optimize risk reductions. After considering specific examples for the Risk Analysis and Management for Critical Asset Protection (RAMCAP™) framework used by the Department of Homeland Security, we address fundamental limitations of the product formula. These include its failure to adjust for correlations among its components, the nonadditivity of risks estimated using the formula, its inability to use risk-scoring results to allocate defensive resources optimally, and the intrinsic subjectivity and ambiguity of the threat, vulnerability, and consequence numbers.
Keywords: Success Probability; Homeland Security; Successful Attack; Index Policy; Probabilistic Risk Assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isochp:978-0-387-89014-2_15
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9780387890142
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-89014-2_15
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().