Criteria for Evaluating Group Decision-Making Methods

Thomas L. Saaty () and Luis G. Vargas ()
Additional contact information
Thomas L. Saaty: University of Pittsburgh
Luis G. Vargas: University of Pittsburgh

Chapter Chapter 13 in Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, 2013, pp 295-318 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In this chapter we are concerned with the development of criteria for evaluating different methods of group decision-making that range from the strictly technical, to the psychophysical and social, and finally, to the logical and scientific. Our purpose is to identify similarities and differences with the aim of showing from such wide consideration which method is more attractive, and is likely to gain greater attention both in academia and in practice.

Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process; Bayesian Analysis; Goal Programming; Matrix Evaluation; Conjoint Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-7279-7_13

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781461472797

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7_13

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().