Causal vs. Spurious Spatial Exposure-Response Associations in Health Risk Analysis

Louis Anthony Cox
Additional contact information
Louis Anthony Cox: Cox Associates and University of Colorado

Chapter Chapter 8 in Quantitative Risk Analysis of Air Pollution Health Effects, 2021, pp 195-217 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter extends to spatial statistics the main theme from Chap. 7 : that positive exposure-response coefficients in regression models are not valid substitutes for quantitative risk assessment, because statistical coefficients do not usually reveal causal relationships. Many recent health risk assessments have noted that adverse health outcomes are significantly statistically associated with proximity to suspected sources of health hazard, such as manufacturing plants or point sources of air pollution. Using geographic proximity to sources as surrogates for exposure to (possibly unknown) releases, spatial ecological studies have identified potential adverse health effects based on significant regression coefficients between risk rates and distances from sources in multivariate statistical risk models. Although this procedure has been fruitful in identifying exposure-response associations, the resulting regression coefficients typically lack valid causal interpretations. Spurious spatial regression and other threats to valid causal inference discussed in this chapter undermine practical efforts to causally link health effects to geographic sources, even when there are clear statistical associations between them. This chapter demonstrates the methodological problems by examining statistical associations and regression coefficients between spatially distributed exposure and response variables in a realistic spatial data set. We find that distance from “nonsense” sources (such as arbitrary points or lines) are highly statistically significant predictors of cause-specific risks, such as traffic fatalities and incidence of Kaposi’s Sarcoma. However, the signs of such associations typically depend on the distance scale chosen. This is consistent with theoretical analyses showing that random spatial trends (which tend to fluctuate in sign), rather than true causal relations, can create statistically significant regression coefficients: spatial location itself becomes a confounder for spatially distributed exposure and response variables. Hence, extreme caution, and careful application of spatial statistical methods are warranted before interpreting proximity-based exposure-response relations as evidence of a possible or probable causal relation.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-030-57358-4_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030573584

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57358-4_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().