Quantitative Risk Assessment of Human Risks of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Swine Operations

Louis Anthony Cox, Douglas A. Popken and Richard X. Sun
Additional contact information
Louis Anthony Cox: Cox Associates
Douglas A. Popken: Cox Associates
Richard X. Sun: Cox Associates

Chapter Chapter 6 in Causal Analytics for Applied Risk Analysis, 2018, pp 333-352 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Describing quantitatively how large a risk is provides crucial information for helping to set risk management priorities. This chapter applies descriptive analytics to assess the size of the human health risks from a particular source. It continues the theme begun in Chap. 5 of examining human health risks from antibiotic-resistant infectious bacteria, but focuses specifically on long-standing concerns expressed by the public health community, news media, and members of the general public that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmitted from pigs to humans may harm human health. For readers not interested in details of this application, a brief summary is that previous studies of the prevalence and dynamics of swine-associated (ST398) MRSA have sampled MRSA at discrete points in the presumed causal chain leading from swine to human patients, including sampling bacteria from live pigs, retail meats, farm workers, and hospital patients. This chapter integrates available data from several sources to construct a conservative (plausible upper-bound) probability estimate for the quantitative human health harm (MRSA infections and fatalities) arising from ST398-MRSA from pigs. The estimated plausible upper bounds are approximately one excess human infection per year among all U.S. pig farm workers, and one human infection per 31 years among the remaining total population of the U.S., assuming that bacteria transmission events not yet observed are possible. The true risks may be smaller (possibly zero for members of the general population). Putting rough numerical bounds on the size of the risk such as “less than one case per 300 million people per decade” can help to engage System 2 thinking (cognitive, slow, deliberative; see Chap. 12 ) about costs and benefits of risk-reducing interventions; whereas leaving the risk unquantified is more likely to engage System 1 thinking (intuitive, quick, emotional; see Chap. 12 ), which typically reacts very strongly and adversely to the qualitative idea of contamination of food with invisible, harmful microbes.

Keywords: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA); Retail Meat; Human Health Risk; Pork Consumers; Meat Handlers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:isochp:978-3-319-78242-3_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319782423

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78242-3_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Series in Operations Research & Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().