The Effect of Inter-group Competition in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
Yoshio Iida
Additional contact information
Yoshio Iida: Kyoto Sangyo University
A chapter in Developments on Experimental Economics, 2007, pp 157-162 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract This study focuses on the effect of inter-group competition in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Recent experimental studies have investigated inter-group competitions in which matched teams compete against each other to produce larger contributions (cooperation within one’s group). Bornstein et al. and Goren (Bornstein [3], Bornstein and Ben-Yossef [2], Bornstein, Erev and Goren [3], Goren [6], Goren and Bornstein [6]) investigate the inter-group competition of a special prisoner’s dilemma. Features of their game fit the examples of lobbying, wars, and similar forms of competition: 1) no contribution is a dominant strategy for all players in the game, 2) no contribution is the collectively (i.e., Pareto) efficient outcome of the game. The studies also show that competition has a positive effect on the cooperative decision, but that the effect does not last when the game is repeated.
Keywords: Contribution Rate; Average Contribution; Group Project; Dominant Strategy; Public Good Game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:lnechp:978-3-540-68660-6_13
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783540686606
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68660-6_13
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().