A Comparison of Two Visualisation Methods for Decision Support in MCDM Problems

Bastian Schmidtmann (), Genoveva Uskova (), Harald Uhlemair () and Jutta Geldermann ()
Additional contact information
Bastian Schmidtmann: Leibniz Universitaet Hannover
Genoveva Uskova: Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen
Harald Uhlemair: Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen
Jutta Geldermann: Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen

A chapter in Operations Research Proceedings 2012, 2014, pp 83-89 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The Outranking method PROMETHEE comprises as a visualization method Geometrical Analysis for Interactive Aid (GAIA). Another visualisation method is Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) linked with Property Fitting. This paper compares the two different approaches.

Keywords: Principal Component Analysis; Decision Maker; Visualisation Method; Single Criterion; Procrustes Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-319-00795-3_13

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319007953

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00795-3_13

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Operations Research Proceedings from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().