How Often Are You Decisive: an Enquiry About the Pivotality of Voting Rules

Tobias Lindner ()
Additional contact information
Tobias Lindner: University of Karlsruhe

A chapter in Operations Research Proceedings 2007, 2008, pp 185-190 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The probability that an individual is decisive in an election is an important criterion for the evaluation of voting rules. It depends on factors such as the number and the behaviour of the other voters, the available alternatives and, of course, also on the voting rule itself. Classical power indices like the Banzhaf- or the Shapley-Shubik-Index are only applicable in special cases. In this paper, an approach is proposed that can be viewed as a natural extension of the Banzhaf-Index for more than two alternatives and for different stochastic assumptions. The approach is applied to plurality voting with two and more alternatives and computed for variations of the number of voters and alternatives. For three alternatives the pivotality is also computed for the Borda-Rule. The comparison of the computations for three alternatives shows that the probability of being decisive under the Borda-Rule is uniformly larger than under plurality voting.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:oprchp:978-3-540-77903-2_29

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783540779032

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77903-2_29

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Operations Research Proceedings from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().