Government Welfare Grant and Low-Income Households Investment Behaviour in South Africa

Babatunde Abimbola Abiola () and Lawrence O. Obokoh Fca ()
Additional contact information
Babatunde Abimbola Abiola: Department of Cost and Management Accounting, Faculty of Business and Commerce, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
Lawrence O. Obokoh Fca: Johannesburg Business School, University of Johannesburg

A chapter in Towards Digitally Transforming Accounting and Business Processes, 2024, pp 681-695 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This study delves into the socio-economic factors influencing the investment patterns of low-income households, often termed non-Ricardian households (NRHs), in South Africa. These NRHs predominantly rely on governmental welfare benefits for their daily needs. The main research question is to empirically investigate if government welfare grant crowd-out low-income household investment in South Africa. Utilizing data from the first five waves of the National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS), we explored the socio-economic traits of NRHs. Analysis methods included pooled ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed and random effects, IV-GMM approaches to address the problem with endogeneity. A significant finding was that household grants appeared to deter investments, suggesting that welfare benefits might inadvertently suppress the investment initiatives of these households. This underscores the adage that merely giving fish might weaken a household’s drive to learn fishing. Moreover, socio-economic variables explained roughly 48% of the investment tendencies of these South African households. The persistent nature of poverty establishes a detrimental cycle wherein one issue amplifies another, potentially leading to issues like reverse causality, which could question the validity of pooled OLS estimates in this study. Nevertheless, the study’s results and implications are vital for policymakers. To address this, the government should prioritize fostering entrepreneurship, particularly among historically marginalized communities, to combat inequality. This approach has the potential to generate lasting wealth, reducing the number of families that fall into the low-income category in future generations.

Keywords: Investment; Non-Ricardian households (non-Ricardian households); Government grants (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-46177-4_36

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031461774

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-46177-4_36

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().