Bridging Social Capital and Financial Incentives: Navigating Liability and Regulatory Challenges in DAO Governance

Lukas Weidener (), Benjamin Heurich and Bence Lukács
Additional contact information
Lukas Weidener: Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum, UMIT Tirol—Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften und -technologie
Benjamin Heurich: Institute for Applied Blockchain (IABC)
Bence Lukács: Institute for Applied Blockchain (IABC)

A chapter in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations—Governance, Technology, and Legal Perspectives, 2026, pp 97-113 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) promise to transform governance through blockchain-enabled transparency and communal decision-making. However, unresolved legal responsibilities and speculative governance token dynamics complicate their ability to maintain trust, encourage participation, and secure legitimacy. Drawing primarily on Social Capital Theory (SCT), this study shows how bonding, bridging, and linking social capital intersect with liability ambiguities and token concentration to undermine institutional confidence and grassroots engagement. Public Goods Theory (PGT) clarifies how free-rider tendencies can deter infrastructural support, while Principal-Agent Theory (PAT) highlights incentive misalignments when whales prioritize short-term gains over collective welfare. Through a theoretical lens, this study illuminates how token-based power asymmetries, a lack of regulatory clarity, and conflicting motivations strain the viability of DAOs in fulfilling the promise of decentralized governance. In synthesizing these frameworks, this study advocates tailored governance strategies, ranging from reputation-based voting models to legally compliant organizational wrappers, to mitigate power imbalances, foster inclusive decision-making, and ultimately strengthen DAOs’ resilience in an evolving blockchain ecosystem. By bridging the sociological, economic, and legal perspectives, this study illustrates the interplay of trust, accountability, and incentives that shape DAO sustainability.

Keywords: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs); Governance; Social capital theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-03273-7_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032032737

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().