Fighting the Un-ethical Online Marketing Post-Covid: An Analysis of the Domain Name Model

Paul Cosmovici (), Adrian Ionuț Moșescu, Daniela Marinică () and Denisa Roxana Botea-Muntean ()
Additional contact information
Paul Cosmovici: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Adrian Ionuț Moșescu: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Daniela Marinică: Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Denisa Roxana Botea-Muntean: Bucharest University of Economic Studies

A chapter in Leading Change in Disruptive Times, 2026, pp 195-205 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract With the current development of on-line sales, after the Covid crisis, domain names use and abuse have become more than actual, generating a new wave of conflicts with the legitimate owners of trademarks. Recent studies show a significant increase in domain-names disputes. While most research examines statistical trends or economic factors driving domain name disputes, this study delves into the interpretative framework of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) to uncover how “bad faith” is assessed in arbitration. Using a qualitative case law analysis, this study examines key UDRP rulings to uncover both written and unwritten criteria influencing arbitration outcomes. Findings indicate that UDRP panels apply a flexible yet evolving interpretative framework, sometimes assuming a quasi-legislative role to address ambiguities. This research introduces two original models to enhance consistency and predictability in UDRP decision-making. The Five Zone Model for Fraudulent Use Analysis systematically classifies cases based on similarity, legitimate rights, and “bad faith”, offering a structured method for understanding panel reasoning. The Decision-Making Model for Fraudulent Marketing provides a framework for evaluating abusive domain name registrations, identifying key decision-making patterns. Given that proving “bad faith” is one of the three fundamental criteria for domain name recovery, these models offer valuable insights for arbitrators, policymakers, and trademark owners. This study highlights the need for regulatory refinements to maintain ethical standards in online commerce while ensuring a fair balance between trademark protection and domain registrant rights.

Keywords: post-covid sales; ethical marketing; good-faith; domain names; on-line marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-19276-9_15

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032192769

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-19276-9_15

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().