 Choosing the Appropriate Technology for Wastewater Treatment Regarding Energy SustainabilityDavid Pereira () and
Inês Moura ()
A chapter in Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies, 2018, pp 319-326 from Springer Abstract: Abstract This paper intends to present a study about the costing of construction and operation of a particular branch of wastewater treatment: the use of activated sludge systems. There are three classical options of this process taken into consideration: extended aeration, conventional aeration with standard rate sludge digestion and conventional aeration with high rate sludge digestion and energy valorization. In a large range of served population the treatment alternatives were evaluated, designed according to the current parameters. The economic study of the treatment alternative used a geometrical pre-design, followed by measured work and quotation. This technical-economical modeling allows for the obtainment of interesting conclusions for the future design of wastewater treatment plants, whether they be new facilities or installations that need enlargement and/or rehabilitation. Based on practical assumptions there’s a definition of the served population which brings advantages to the use of one or other alternatives, considering almost exclusively economical and financial criteria. The designer must have the responsibility to consider other factors that are discussed widely. The purpose of the present study, being an academic dissertation, was to offer a general tool for decision. Since it was based on actual average market conditions, it may present deviations when applied to real situations, requiring adaptation from qualified technicians. As it is well-known a wider range of contributing equivalent population should be served, with advantages, by a treatment that incorporates biogas use from mesophilic anaerobic digestion, to produce heat and/ or electricity. On the other hand, smaller equivalent populations use to their advantage extended aeration systems, without separated digestion. The question to answer was for what population there was no doubt about the decision to take without making too many design exercises. In this study the range of populations where one or other system is obviously a good option are divided by a middle range, called “the doubt region”, that has to be studied with more accuracy, due to local and particular characteristics. This “doubt region” includes activated sludge systems with conventional aeration using standard rate anaerobic digestion or treated digestion or extended aeration ones, competing according to actual local conditions. These qualitative results were expected, being the present dissertation a contribution to delimit these results in a quantitative way. It was concluded that the conventional aerated systems with standard rate digestion start to compensate, comparing with the extended aeration systems costs, in 15 years, for served equivalent populations higher than 10,000 inhabitants. The activated sludge conventional aeration system with heated and mixed digesters and energy production from biogas becomes economically viable for the same project duration, from about 35,000 inhabitants served (according to this study, from 33,500 inhabitants), regarding average Portuguese conditions. In between, deep studies must be done, wherein there is the possibility of using separate digestion of primary and secondary sludge in standard rate digesters, a type of solution that is falling into disuse, because of the exploration´s disadvantages, but whose study should be performed to reduce the inconveniences, decrease the energetic consumptions in comparison with extended aeration systems, for a range of equivalent population where the implementation of high rate digestion with energy production is not yet justified. Keywords: Wastewater treatment; Activated sludge process; Anaerobic digestion; Cost minimization; Energy balance (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-67101-7_25 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67101-7_25 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.