Effects of Cash and In-Kind Housing Assistance on Asset Accumulation in Low-Income Households

Jina Kim, Chunho Yeom and Seunghan Ro ()
Additional contact information
Jina Kim: University of Seoul, Institute of Urban Science
Chunho Yeom: University of Seoul, International School of Urban Sciences
Seunghan Ro: Konkuk University, Department of Real Estate Studies

A chapter in Entrepreneurship and Human-Centric Business Strategies for Social and Economic Resilience, 2026, pp 2709-2723 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This study aims to identify and compare the causal effects of Korea’s main housing support programs on asset accumulation among low-income households, specifically contrasting public rental housing (in-kind support) and housing allowance (cash support). The novelty of this research lies in the use of nationally representative data from the 2016–2021 Housing Condition Survey and rigorous statistical techniques—including propensity score matching and regression analysis—to assess asset-building outcomes by support type, a rarely studied topic in the Korean context. Analysis reveals that recipients of public rental housing experienced significantly greater asset growth than those residing in private rental accommodations, while participation in permanent rental housing was negatively associated with asset accumulation. Housing allowance programs did not show a significant effect on asset growth, implying that beneficiaries may prioritize immediate consumption needs over savings. Residential stability, measured by tenure duration, emerged as a key determinant of asset accumulation. These findings underscore the importance of policy differentiation: public rental housing can facilitate upward mobility among low-income households, whereas permanent rental housing programs may require supplementary income stabilization measures. An integrated approach that combines housing and labor market policies is warranted to enhance asset-building opportunities and address persistent inequalities in housing welfare. Data limitations include a focus on households newly receiving benefits between 2016 and 2021 and incomplete coverage of asset formation variables, indicating a need for future studies with broader datasets and variables.

Keywords: Housing policy; Public rental housing; Housing allowance; Low-income households; South Korea (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-95-6415-6_167

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789819564156

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-6415-6_167

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().