Exit Choice Under Uncertainty: Renewable Versus Non-renewable Energy Firms

Samhitha Kasibhatta () and Runa Sarkar
Additional contact information
Samhitha Kasibhatta: Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
Runa Sarkar: Indian Institute of Management Calcutta

A chapter in Financial Markets, Climate Risk and Renewables, 2024, pp 91-108 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Early stage investors in startups typically choose to exit from their investments through initial public offerings (IPOs) or acquisitions, often because they need access to more capital for growth. The need for capital to scale up is especially true for startups in the energy sector, where the technology tends to be capital intensive and front loaded. Often, such startups take the IPO route. Previous literature in the area of IPOs and acquisitions focuses on the rationale behind firms’ preferred exit mechanisms. Bayar and Chemmanur (2012), for example, find that in industries without a dominant market player, more capital intensive firms and firms which are harder to value, typically prefer IPOs, and that valuation premia for IPOs disappear after controlling for these attributes. In this paper, we examine the difference in performance, exit patterns and value obtained between renewable and non-renewable energy firms. Further, we study whether firms benefit from the presence of funding, by including an indicator variable for the presence of funding and assessing its impact on their performance. The renewable energy industry, being a riskier (due to uncertainty about future revenues) and, at present, more favourable category compared to the non-renewable energy industry, offers us a setting to compare exit propensities of firms towards IPOs against acquisitions. We find a plenitude of interesting results: first, we find that in the energy sector, smaller firms are more likely to go public than get acquired. Further, firms in the renewable energy sector tend to go for an IPO rather than get acquired, which is consistent with the findings of (Bayar and Chemmanur in J Financ Quantit Anal 46:1755–1793, 2011). Third, acquisitions tend to help companies in the energy sector to close the performance gap with firms which go for an IPO. We contribute to the literature by studying whether early stage investors in the energy sector obtain more value through IPOs or acquisitions across the industry, and whether the riskiness of the category of the firm within the same industry impacts exit choice. This would help policymakers understand the importance of funding and Private Equity/Venture Capital backing in improving the value of the firm.

Keywords: IPOs; Acquisitions; Exit choices; Renewable energy; Valuation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-97-6687-1_14

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789819766871

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-6687-1_14

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().