Designing for Sustainability: Lessons Learned from Four Industrial Projects

Patricia Lago (), Roberto Verdecchia, Nelly Condori-Fernandez, Eko Rahmadian, Janina Sturm, Thijmen van Nijnanten, Rex Bosma, Christophe Debuysscher and Paulo Ricardo
Additional contact information
Patricia Lago: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Roberto Verdecchia: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Nelly Condori-Fernandez: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Eko Rahmadian: University of Groningen
Janina Sturm: German Development Institute
Thijmen van Nijnanten: Vandebron
Rex Bosma: European Patent Office
Christophe Debuysscher: European Patent Office
Paulo Ricardo: European Patent Office

A chapter in Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics, 2021, pp 3-18 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Scientific research addressing the relation between software and sustainability is slowly maturing in two focus areas, related to ‘sustainable software’ and ‘software for sustainability’. The first is better understood and may include research foci like energy efficient software and software maintainability. It most-frequently covers ‘technical’ concerns. The second, ‘software for sustainability’, is much broader in both scope and potential impact, as it entails how software can contribute to sustainability goals in any sector or application domain. Next to the technical concerns, it may also cover economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Differently from researchers, practitioners are often not aware or well-trained in all four types of software sustainability concerns. To address this need, in previous work we have defined the Sustainability-Quality Assessment Framework (SAF) and assessed its viability via the analysis of a series of software projects. Nevertheless, it was never used by practitioners themselves, hence triggering the question: What can we learn from the use of SAF in practice? To answer this question, we report the results of practitioners applying the SAF to four industrial cases. The results show that the SAF helps practitioners in (1) creating a sustainability mindset in their practices, (2) uncovering the relevant sustainability-quality concerns for the software project at hand, and (3) reasoning about the inter-dependencies and trade-offs of such concerns as well as the related short- and long-term implications. Next to improvements for the SAF, the main lesson for us as researchers is the missing explicit link between the SAF and the (technical) architecture design.

Keywords: Decision maps; Sustainability-quality model; Design concerns; Lessons learned; Industrial projects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-030-61969-5_1

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030619695

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61969-5_1

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Progress in IS from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().