Evaluate Contest Contributions

Anders Hjalmarsson (), Gustaf Juell-Skielse and Paul Johannesson
Additional contact information
Anders Hjalmarsson: University of Borås & RISE Viktoria
Gustaf Juell-Skielse: Stockholm University & RISE Viktoria
Paul Johannesson: Stockholm University

Chapter Chapter 11 in Open Digital Innovation, 2017, pp 89-99 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In this chapter, six methods for evaluating contest contributions are presented. The methods are described in terms of meaning and their implications on the presentation and submission of contributions. The methods are also mapped to the types of contest goals introduced in the activity Set goals, thereby providing guidance for choosing an evaluation method based on the contest goals. The chapter also contains a roadmap for choosing and preparing an evaluation method, as well as guidance as to how organisers should communicate evaluation results to the participants. The chapter is concluded with a running example section that describes experiences and lessons learned from several of the contests referred to in this book.

Keywords: Evaluation Method; Automate Evaluation; Digital Service; Contest Outcome; Jury Member (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-319-56339-8_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319563398

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56339-8_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Progress in IS from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().