Bootstrapping the Next Generation of Social Machines

Dave Murray-Rust () and Dave Robertson ()
Additional contact information
Dave Murray-Rust: University of Edinburgh
Dave Robertson: University of Edinburgh

A chapter in Crowdsourcing, 2015, pp 53-71 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The term “social machines” denotes a class of systems where humans and machines interact so that computational infrastructure supports human creativity. Flagship examples such as Wikipedia and Ushahidi demonstrate how computational coordination can enhance information sharing and aggregation, while the Zooniverse family of projects show how social machines can produce scientific knowledge. These socio-technical systems cannot easily be analysed in purely computational or purely sociological terms, and they cannot be reduced to Turing machines. Social machines are used in the creation of software, from software crowdsourcing projects such as TopCoder and oDesk, to distributed development platforms such at GitHub and BitbucketBitbucket . Hence, social machines are increasingly used to create the software infrastructureSoftware infrastructure for new social machine. However, social machine development is a more complex process than software development, as the community must be “programmed” as well as the machines. This leads to development in the context evolving and unknown requirements, and having to deal with more sociological concepts than formal systems designers usually work with. We hence model the process using two coupled social machines: the target social machineSocial machine , with whatever purposes the creators envisions, and the development social machine which is used to create it. As an example, oDeskOdesk can form part of a development social machineSocial machine which might be used to create a target social machine, e.g. “the next Facebook”. In this chapter, we describe a formalism for social machines, consisting of i) a community of humans and their “social software” Social software interacting with ii) a collection of computational resources and their associated state, protocolsProtocols and ability to analyse data and make inferences. We draw on the ideas of ‘desire lines’ Desire lines and ‘play-in’ to argue that top down design of social machines is impossible, that we hence need to leverage computational support in creating complex systems in an iterative, dynamic and emergent manner, and that our formalism provides a possible blueprint for how to do this.

Keywords: Software Development; Computational Infrastructure; Collective Intelligence; Social Software; Machine Software (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-662-47011-4_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783662470114

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-47011-4_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Progress in IS from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().