Protest Publics as Democratic Innovators in Authoritarian Environments

Artem Uldanov (), Tatiana Davtyan and Fedor Alekseenkov
Additional contact information
Artem Uldanov: National Research University Higher School of Economics (NRU-HSE)
Tatiana Davtyan: National Research University Higher School of Economics (NRU-HSE)
Fedor Alekseenkov: National Research University Higher School of Economics (NRU-HSE)

A chapter in Protest Publics, 2019, pp 259-276 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter aims to examine how mass protests affected processes of sociopolitical changes in Russia and China in the case of Hong Kong and Turkey. All three countries (with certain exceptions in the case of Hong Kong) are characterized as authoritarian states where blast of mass protests happened during the period 2011–2017. In each case, the situation with authoritarian rule has different aspects: Russia slowly moves from a democratic hybrid regime to authoritarianism since 2003 under control of President Vladimir Putin; In Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is trying to unite the nation around his figure and changing political regime to achieve undisputed power; and Hong Kong was under British rule till 1999 and returned into China on a particular agreement that the political regime established during the “colonial” period, which will not be reduced to all-China conditions. Nevertheless, different pathways led to similar results—shrinking space for independent political institutions and violations of fundamental rights and freedoms are not tolerated by the part of society in all three countries. Without working mechanisms to launch policy change, citizens choose protests as a way to show authorities their disagreement and anger over the authoritarian manner of policy-making. We argue that in these countries, activists and citizens were able to organize themselves around a discourse of policy change, to form a “protest public,” unsatisfied with the political regime; and then, due to the reaction of the state, to create alternative democratic practices in sociopolitical activity. With such a strategy, a “protest public” could be considered as an actor of change, whose role is to create democratic innovations to oppose strict and repressive policies maintained by the state.

Keywords: Russia; Turkey; Hong Kong; Mass protests; Public participation; Authoritarian regimes; Protest publics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:socchp:978-3-030-05475-5_14

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030054755

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05475-5_14

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Societies and Political Orders in Transition from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().