Toward a Theory of Hybrid Warfare

Larry Goodson (), Abram Trosky (), Marzena Żakowska, Ketevan Chincharadze, Yashwani Kularia and Peter Stanwood
Additional contact information
Larry Goodson: US Army War College
Abram Trosky: US Army War College
Marzena Żakowska: Aleja Generała Antoniego Chruściela
Ketevan Chincharadze: The Aspen Institute
Yashwani Kularia: NYU Center for Global Affairs
Peter Stanwood: University of St Andrews, School of International Relations

A chapter in Dynamics of Disasters, 2026, pp 163-187 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract An emergent feature of renewed great power competition is the disintegration of last century’s safeguards against escalation, including nuclear deterrence’s collateral effect on disincentivizing large-scale conventional uses of force. In brief historical and national case studies, the authors illustrate how the “gray zone” of unconventional, irregular, proxy, and hybrid forms of warfare flourished in the Cold War’s shadow and metastasized into a suite of political, informational, and cyber weapons that great powers and aspiring great powers are wielding with increasing sophistication and risk. We argue neither this proliferation of terms, nor the heuristic of strategic competition and crisis, have enabled academic, government, or military strategists and practitioners to meet and mitigate hybrid threats. This paper untangles the paradox of how the asymmetric advantages of low cost, novel, and deniable hybrid war tactics invite miscommunication and miscalculation that risk triggering the very escalation they were developed to avoid. It also addresses a second paradox of how the United States, despite being credited with originating the hybrid toolkit of political warfare, seems less able as hegemon to effectively deter or respond to informational, cyber, and other attacks. By exploring Iranian, Russian, and Chinese development of simple, complex, and advanced hybrid war, respectively, we uncover some of the bureaucratic, cognitive, and strategic blocks the U.S. has in defending against, if not exploiting, hybrid elements.

Keywords: Great power competition; Hybrid war; Unconventional war; Irregular war; Information warfare; Cyber warfare; Gray-zone warfare; Grand strategy; Strategic competition; Conflict continuum; International relations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-032-08606-8_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032086068

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-08606-8_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Optimization and Its Applications from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().