EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Kempe–Heawood’s Five-Color Theorem and Tait’s Equivalence

Alexander Soifer
Additional contact information
Alexander Soifer: University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences

Chapter Chapter 21 in The New Mathematical Coloring Book, 2024, pp 217-229 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract I am compelled to present here Alfred Bray Kempe’s attempted proof of the four-color conjecture (4CC). As you recall from Chap. 20 , that proof contained an oversight, found a “mere” 11 years later by Percy John Heawood. Why then do I choose to present the unsuccessful attempt here? First of all because of the beautiful ideas Kempe invented. Second, because it is not easy to notice a flaw right away. Third, because P.J. Heawood did not have to do much to salvage Kempe’s ideas to show that, in fact, they (i.e., Kempe’s ideas!) prove the five-color theorem. Finally, because just like their contemporaries underestimated the work of Heawood, my contemporaries often underestimate the contributions of Kempe.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-0716-3597-1_21

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781071635971

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3597-1_21

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2026-08-06
Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-0716-3597-1_21