A Comparison Among the Three Strategic Frameworks: Porter, the Resource-Based View of the Firm, and the Delta Model

Arnoldo C. Hax
Additional contact information
Arnoldo C. Hax: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Chapter Chapter 11 in The Delta Model, 2010, pp 207-226 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In spite of the enormous proliferation of competing schemes in the business strategy literature, there are two fundamental paradigms that have emerged as the most influential in the last two decades. First, Competitive Positioning, as proposed by Michael Porter from the Harvard Business School in the 1980s, and, second, the Resource-Based View of the Firm that evolved during the 1990s.

Keywords: Competitive Advantage; Bargaining Power; Competitive Position; Harvard Business Review; Strategic Management Journal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4419-1480-4_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781441914804

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1480-4_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().