Uniqueness and Uncertainty

Michael Elad ()
Additional contact information
Michael Elad: The Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Computer Science Department

Chapter Chapter 2 in Sparse and Redundant Representations, 2010, pp 17-33 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract We return to the basic problem (P 0), which is at the core of our discussion, $${\left(P_o\right):\quad \min\limits_X \parallel \mathbf{X}\parallel_0 \,{\rm subject\,\, to} \mathbf \quad \mathbf{b}=\mathbf{A\mathbf{x}}}.$$ While we shall refer hereafter to this problem as our main goal, we stress that we are quite aware of its two major shortcomings in leading to any practical tool. 1. The equality requirement b = A X is too strict, as there are small chances for any vector b to be represented by a few columns from A. A better requirement would be one that allows for small deviation. 2. The sparsity measure is too sensitive to very small entries in X, and a better measure would adopt a more forgiving approach towards such small entries.

Keywords: Uncertainty Principle; Diagonal Entry; Generalize Uncertainty Principle; Sparse Solution; Small Entry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4419-7011-4_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781441970114

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7011-4_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().