A Rejoinder to Fienberg’s Comments

David A. Freedman
Additional contact information
David A. Freedman: University of California, Department of Statistics

Chapter 14 in Cohort Analysis in Social Research, 1985, pp 385-390 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In our various ways, Fienberg and I are both addressing the relevance of Standard Statistical models to social science research. I found it convenient to make part of my argument in terms of a comparison between the use of models in the natural sciences and in the social sciences. Fienberg seems to disagree more with my history lesson than with its conclusions, but that may be a matter of rhetoric—on both sides.

Keywords: Stochastic Model; Social Science Research; Projection Pursuit; Social Science Research Council; Standard Statistical Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4613-8536-3_14

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781461385363

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8536-3_14

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().