SCADA for the Rest of Us: Unlicensed Bands Supporting Long-Range Communications

John M. Chapin () and William Lehr
Additional contact information
John M. Chapin: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Chapter Chapter 16 in Broadband Networks, Smart Grids and Climate Change, 2013, pp 215-241 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract We are on the cusp of the next big wave in Internet and wireless technology for the mass market: the emergence of ubiquitous smart environments capable of automated sensing and interaction with the physical world around us. A critical ingredient for this future is the deployment and availability of wireless control network infrastructure and services. Most discussions of the future smart environment focus on large systems managed by large corporate or public entities: smart power grids, smart freshwater and wastewater management, and so on. The distributed communications and control mechanisms that automate these infrastructure systems are called SCADA (forsupervisory control and data acquisition). Most work on SCADA has correspondingly considered the focused networks that support a single large system or application. This paper considers the linked technical, economic, and policy issues of making SCADA available for a much larger and more diverse set of systems than have previously been discussed. Examples include the health clinic interested in at-home monitoring of rural diabetes patients; the town interested in deploying sensors to detect icing on dangerous roads; and the farmer who wants to automatically lower a retention pond’s water level when high flow rates are measured miles upstream in a national forest. We describe the requirements for SCADA communications services that will support affordable automated control for a large number of small and distributed systems like these. We briefly survey a range of candidate entities that might seek to meet these requirements. We argue that achieving the desired technical and economic outcome will require both service provider and end-user deployed networks. We propose allocation of a small unlicensed spectrum band of a new type to support growth in this direction. The difference from previous unlicensed allocations is that a few simple limitations on device behavior (a spectrum etiquette) provide predictability for long-range communications, by ensuring that spectrum congestion results in increased delay rather than reduced range. We describe an example of such an etiquette called adaptive duty cycle limit.

Keywords: Advantage Location; Mobile Service Provider; Unlicensed Band; Unlicensed Spectrum; Geolocation Database (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4614-5266-9_16

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781461452669

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5266-9_16

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().