How Pioneering Managers Strive to Integrate Social Risk Management in Government Debt Collection

Paola Bernardi (), Francesca Ricciardi (), Canio Forliano () and E. Sorano ()
Additional contact information
Paola Bernardi: University of Turin
Francesca Ricciardi: University of Turin
Canio Forliano: University of Turin
E. Sorano: University of Turin

Chapter Chapter 12 in The Future of Risk Management, Volume I, 2019, pp 269-302 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This study explores risk management issues in local government-owned enterprises in accordance with the third wave of governance, organization and management logics of Public Administration: the Public Value (PV) approach. However, the coexistence between the emerging PV approach and the more traditional and consolidated ones is often difficult, also because of the resistance of shareholders who may not consider the management of system-level risks as a priority mission for their company. For this reason, we have analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of the Traditional Approach and the New Public Management approach in the public sector management.

Keywords: Social risk; Anti-corruption risk; Transparency; Public Value approach; Local government-owned enterprise (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-14548-4_12

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030145484

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14548-4_12

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().