Critical Epidemiology in Latin America: Roots, Philosophical and Methodological Ruptures

Jaime Breilh
Additional contact information
Jaime Breilh: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar

A chapter in Philosophical and Methodological Debates in Public Health, 2019, pp 21-45 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Epidemiology as any other scientific work dealing with social and human wellbeing runs under great social pressure. Its conceptual and practical tools have developed in concrete historical conditions facing evident social inequity. In recent times, neoliberal economic acceleration, through the ongoing fourth industrial revolution, has globalized massive unhealthy processes and expanded economic and political influences. In Latin America critical epidemiology evolved from the early 1970s social medicine movement. However limited by its subordinate position with respect to mainstream medicine, this insurgent academic position grew as a counteractive intellectual and political tradition that based its initial impulse on epistemological clarity and activism. Contrary to the linear functionalist thinking of conventional medical science—that separates the understanding of health conditions from their social and cultural contexts—critical social medicine broke away from that positivist framework. This chapter discusses the historical roots, epistemological and methodological ruptures of critical epidemiology. It describes the formation of the social determination of health paradigm of dialectical, complex, critical thinking with its potential for an emancipatory perspective of health reform. In the same breath, it presents a sound critique of the “knowledge illusion” of linear, reductionist causal thinking, while assuming transformative science as the reference for an integral scientific objectiveness that confronts and redefines the traditional notion of objectivity and recovers the active transforming role of the subject in science. It proposes complex thinking to decipher the real requisites of rigorous epidemiology, which does not only depend on the accuracy, reliability and validity of its empirical methods, calculations and observations but on a rigorous and multidimensional/complex/transdisciplinary/intercultural understanding of society and health.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Critical science; Complex thinking; (Health) epistemology; Methodology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-28626-2_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030286262

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28626-2_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().