Who to Believe? Psychology or Economics?

Richard Easterlin

Chapter 13 in An Economist’s Lessons on Happiness, 2021, pp 117-127 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Both psychology and economics have much to offer happiness studies. Psychology is much more receptive to accepting people’s self-reports of their attitudes and feelings and has been the pioneer in vetting measures of happiness and establishing their credibility. Conceptually, psychology’s emphasis on the role of benchmarks in people’s thinking correctly explains how people form happiness judgments. For its part, economics focuses more on state-of-life evaluative gauges of well-being rather than experiential measures reflecting transient moods and prefers conceptually clearer single-item to multi-item indicators. Economists tend too to put less reliance on cross-section vis-a-vis time-series research and emphasize nationally representative population samples as a basis for generalization. Most notably, economics demonstrates the importance of life circumstances in shaping happiness trends and differences. The disciplines together combine to promote a robust, interdisciplinary field.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-61962-6_13

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030619626

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61962-6_13

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().