High Finance Gender Inequity Case Study

Kara Tan Bhala ()
Additional contact information
Kara Tan Bhala: Seven Pillars Institute for Global Finance and Ethics

Chapter Chapter 5 in Ethics in Finance, 2021, pp 43-55 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This case study is about gender discrimination on the job. The story is about how women were consistently and deliberately excluded from a high-level networking event. Discrimination in any of its forms (sex, race, religion, age) is unethical under every ethical system of thought out there today. Focusing on gender discrimination, I explain how this practice is unethical when evaluated through the lenses of (1) justice theory, (2) rights theory, (3) duty-based ethics, (4) natural law theory, (5) utilitarianism, and (6) feminist ethics.

Keywords: #MeToo; Inner Sanctum; Gender exclusion; Gender discrimination; Justice theory; Rights theory; Duty based ethics; Natural law theory; Utilitarianism; Feminist ethics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-73754-2_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030737542

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-73754-2_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().