How Are You Going to Pay for It? The Macroeconomic Benefits of Student Debt Cancellation

Stephanie Kelton
Additional contact information
Stephanie Kelton: Stony Brook University

A chapter in Care, Climate, and Debt, 2022, pp 165-181 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The message I am going to deliver in this chapter is that the dominant way of thinking about money, taxes, and government spending is rooted in a series of misunderstandings that have given rise to a powerful myth, the deficit myth. I will deconstruct this myth in four stages. First, I will describe how the fear of adding to the national debt and deficit spending influences everyday politics. I will then point out that despite bipartisan agreement about the danger of increasing the national debt, the obstacles the deficit myth creates are treated by Republicans and Democrats in distinct ways. Next, I’ll illustrate this difference by comparing republican tax cuts with the democrats’ proposal for student debt cancellation. Finally, I’ll address the following questions: Where does the money come from and where does it go? We conclude by proposing a more appropriate constraint on government spending that dispels the deficit myth.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-96355-2_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030963552

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96355-2_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().